The brief was open-ended: “What could AI do for enterprise data integration?”
It would have been easy to immediately start designing a conversational chatbot or an automated mapping wizard. But jumping straight to features would have solved the wrong problem.
Enterprise source-to-target mapping is not simply drawing lines between columns. It is an arduous process of reconstructing fragmented context across legacy schemas, missing business definitions, scattered documentation, and high regulatory audit risk.
“Don't start with ‘What AI feature should we build?’ Start with: ‘Where is the analyst actually spending cognitive effort?’”
Discovery Context
What I expected vs. what research revealed
▾
What I Expected
AI could parse incoming tables and automatically draw mapping lines between source and target columns.
What I Discovered
Analysts spent 80% of their effort acting as data detectives—hunting down cryptic abbreviations (TX_CAT_V2), wikis, and PDFs before linking a single field.
That Changed the Question
Instead of “Where should AI appear in the UI?”, I asked: “How can AI help the analyst understand the data before mapping begins?”
The Four Operational Realities of Enterprise Data
-
Cryptic Column Naming:
Legacy schemas use abbreviated identifiers (e.g.
TX_CAT_V2) with zero self-describing documentation.
-
Scattered Specifications:
Business rules and glossary definitions live across Confluence pages, email threads, and PDFs.
-
Audit Liability:
Analysts cannot commit unverified AI guesses; every mapping must be auditable during regulatory reviews.
-
Parallel Projects:
Analysts manage multiple product schemas simultaneously and cannot tolerate blocking workflows.